Operator workflow map
The agreed tasks, information hierarchy, exceptions, and acceptance criteria.
← All services
Industrial HMI Sprint
Give operators a clearer view.
Improve one operator workflow with an interface grounded in the way the machine or line is used. Clear status, useful diagnostics, and a maintainable software implementation.
Industrial teams improving software around existing equipment
Sound familiar?
Operators switch between screens to understand one problem.
Alarm messages reveal too little when a line stops.
An aging interface is difficult to extend or support.
What you take away
Deliverables you
can actually use.
The starting package covers one operator workflow and up to five key screens. We confirm the exact boundary together.
Interface design
A reviewable prototype of the key screens and important alarm or diagnostic states.
Implemented software slice
The scoped HMI or supervision workflow with agreed data connections and test checks.
Validation and handover
Operator feedback, a documented acceptance run, and maintenance guidance.
A practical guide
Design an operator workflow around the real task.
An industrial interface needs to help someone understand the current state and choose the right next action. Begin with one operator task, including the moments when the process is waiting, interrupted, or recovering. That gives the interface a meaningful structure.
How to do it yourself
First, walk through the task with an operator and a process expert. Record what starts it, the decisions the operator makes, and what confirms completion. Include the information needed during an abnormal condition. Use the terms people use on the floor and resolve ambiguous meanings together.
Map the process states and the data behind them. Identify which values are live, which can be stale, and which system owns each command. Define what the operator should see if communication is lost. An old value must not quietly appear to be a fresh measurement.
Sketch the essential screens and review them using concrete scenarios. Put the current state, available action, and expected consequence where the operator can find them. Give alarms enough context to support a response, and make important distinctions readable without relying on color alone.
Implement a narrow slice against a simulator or an agreed test environment. Exercise normal operation, invalid input, delayed responses, disconnection, and recovery. Check that the interface confirms what the system actually did rather than assuming a command succeeded when it was sent.
Finally, run the scenarios with representative operators and record their feedback. Refine the information and interaction before planning an approved rollout. Keep the workflow, state definitions, and acceptance record together so maintenance teams can understand the interface later.
How we approach the work
Our experience includes operator-facing software in GEA’s pharma industrial context and software in IBA’s radiopharma environment. That background informs how we connect process knowledge, application states, diagnostics, and maintainable interface code. We work with the people who understand the equipment and its operating constraints.
Our plan is to map one workflow, produce a reviewable interface, implement the agreed software slice, and validate it with operators in the agreed environment. We keep the HMI’s responsibilities and the controller’s responsibilities explicit. The handover includes the decisions and observed acceptance results.
The tools behind the work
Depending on the existing application, .NET with WPF or Blazor can support the interface and its presentation logic. OPC UA, REST APIs, SQL, or the existing industrial connection provide the agreed data access. Simulators and recorded scenarios help exercise unusual states; browser-based screens can also be checked with Playwright.
SDD, Specs Driven Development, connects operator needs to screen and state specifications, implementation issues, and acceptance scenarios. We use those links to show why a behavior exists and which observations support the conclusion that the agreed workflow is ready for review.
Explore the tools
Ready to begin
What we need
from your team.
- A process expert and representative operators
- Existing interface and data-source documentation
- A safe simulator or non-production environment
A few useful answers
Before we start.
Can this work with an existing industrial application?
Yes. We can scope an interface slice around an existing .NET, WPF, WinForms, web, or industrial integration layer. Equipment boundaries and validation responsibilities are agreed up front.
How is the engagement priced?
The indicative estimate starts at €9,500, excluding VAT, for the stated package boundary. After a fit conversation, you receive a fixed quote with the exact deliverables, fee, and schedule. Work starts after acceptance; changes are quoted separately.
What happens after delivery?
You receive the working files, findings, and a handover session. Your team can take the next steps, or we can scope a follow-on engagement together.
Let’s talk about Industrial HMI Sprint
Your next step
starts here.
Tell us what needs to change.
We’ll review your request and come back with a practical next step. No commitment required.
Prefer email? dev@roggemans.com ↗Discuss this package
A little context helps us make the conversation useful.
Keep exploring